patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Neighbors Against Pawcatuck Subdivision Create Blog

Next Public Hearing On The Pawcatuck Subdivision Proposal Set For August

 

A recently introduced blog dubbed Love The Loop is trying to raise awareness about a Cherenzia Company proposal to build a 68-unit attached housing development atn the intersection of Mary Hall and Greenhaven roads in Pawcatuck.

Attached houses are low-rise homes joined by a shared wall; also known as row, or town-houses.

The blog, managed by Pawcatuck resident Peg Moran, was created so people will “hear our story.”

Moran was one of nearly 40 people in attendance at a recent Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on the Pawcatuck subdivision. In addition to the attached houses, the project also includes a total of 11 single-family homes, not yet built, on the perimeter of the site.

A number of neighbors spoke at the hearing in opposition to the proposal, alleging it is inconsistent with the “character of the neighborhood,” among other concerns.  Moran said if the project goes “south” neighbors would be left with “blight.” Moran lives on Mary Hall Road.

Moran and her neighbors have taken their not-in-my-backyard case to the web.

“Having a presence online is an important part of our campaign,” Moran said. “But our approach also includes handing out brochures, posting signs, speaking to audiences, gathering neighbors together to talk, writing letters to the editor, arranging newspaper coverage and building our own website.”

The Richard Panciera Remainder Trust II owns the property. At the public hearing, Panciera Trust treasurer Thomas J. Ligouri Jr. was joined by the project architect and various project engineers to describe the plan; New England house styles, many similar to those found in Stonington Borough, located in a village-style setting with winding pathways, open space, native landscaping, a clubhouse, pool and recreation areas.

Ligouri said three years of study have gone into the proposal and it has all required permits and approvals. The attached homes would range in price from $275,000 to $310,000.  

The applicant is confident, Ligouri said, that the project is in compliance with all town regulations and requirements and said that despite comments to the contrary, the project would not have any greater impact on the neighborhood than would a “traditional single-family home subdivision.”

Moran disagreed and created the blog, she said, because, “neighbors and other town residents need to really understand the impact of such an urban-style, high-density development on our neighborhood. If there are parts of the plan that are disturbing, we want to create conversations about those points.”

Moran described her website, www.lovetheloop.blogspot.com,  as “democracy in action.”

The next public hearing on the proposal is slated for August 2 at 7:30 p.m., at Pawcatuck Middle School.

What do you think of the plan? Tell us in the comments.

Tom

7:23 am on Thursday, June 30, 2011

Moran's website link was misspelled. The actual link is www.lovetheloop.blogspot.com

Reply

peg moran

8:45 am on Thursday, June 30, 2011

I disagree with Mr. Ligouri. Cherenzia does not have "all required permits and approvals."
In order to build high-density housing on the site, Cherenzia needs a special permit. Arguments for and against issuing such a permit will be heard at a Public Hearing of the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 2. Then the Commissioners will decide whether or not to issue a special permit. Peg Moran

Reply

miranda dekay

11:04 am on Thursday, June 30, 2011

MIRANDA

This plan is absurd. To tear apart rural land to build a development that not only does not reflect its surroundings and whose residences are unlikely to sell (who do
the Cherenzia people think is going to buy? Where do they live now? Where do they work? Just count the houses -- in all price ranges -- for sale in Westerly, Pawcatuck and the borough NOW)

Reply

Charles Harding

12:25 pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011

The land should be given to the Stonington Land Trust in return for generous tax deductions. The Town of Stonington will have to raise real estate taxes to absorb the increased costs that will accompany supporting the addition of 79 units. Charles Harding

Reply

holly miller

1:13 pm on Thursday, June 30, 2011

Look around at the other developments that are similar to those proposed off Mary Hall Road: they are empty. This is a waste of the taxpayers money and the townspeoples' time and energy. Leave the land alone and let nature enjoy it. Would these builders want this in their back yard? Probably not!!!

Reply

Dorry Clay

1:18 pm on Saturday, July 2, 2011

(A little off topic but: If Pawcatuck is covered in this Patch then Why isn't it called Stonington-Mystic-Pawcatuck-Patch?)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michael J H Blair

11:51 pm on Thursday, July 7, 2011

Dorry, my read on the Patch name is as follows: Stonington is made up of several communities. Mystic is a zip code shared by two town. Thus if Patch was to include Mystic it would either be Groton-Mystic or Stonington-Mystic. I suspect that Stonington got Mystic because many of the stories are based in Stonington ( Seaport etc). Pawcatuck has had links with Westerly RI, but it's budget, government etc are all Stonington CT based. So I agree with the name association.

Comment_arrow

PAwcatuck Resident

3:59 pm on Thursday, September 15, 2011

Pawcatuck is part of Stonington - most people think we are second class to those that live in downtown, but we pay taxes just like everyone else!

Leave a comment